Do we wait until they sealed the servants (Rev. 7.3), or are we already sealed (Ephesians 1.13 and 4.30) and without "angelic" mediation (II Corinthians 1:21 and 22)? (Read more ...) Will you fight for the faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 3), informed the key word-FORWARD, ie. before, previously, in front, but said (Jude 17 and II Peter 3.2) looking at the contents of the Bible and / or chronological emergence of scriptures?


Did our Lord to events in the gospel already receive from God the Father honor and glory (II Peter 1:17, Matt 17.2 ... 9.3 ... MARK, LUKE 9.29 ...), or we believe the false revelation 5, 12? Shall we believe the eyewitnesses or fictional tales (II Peter 1:16)? He, who did not receive glory from men, but only one God (JOHN 5,41 and 44), as then, ie. why is received from any living creatures (Rev. 4.9) and "elders" evaluated whether he is worthy (Rev. 4.11 and 5.9 and 12)? (Read more about mediation and glory.)




Blessed is the people that know the trumpet cry (Psalm 89.15).

Did the Lord at the Last Supper (Matthew 26.27 to 28; Mark 14:23; Luke 22:17) give the apostles the glass of the New Testament to drink from it or to wash themselvs [Rev.1,5] ?, and some others even and their garments [Rev.7,14]? So, was the Lord's blood shed so that tramples on her body and clothes washing (see Hebrews 10:22 and 10,29)? And even the apostles' feet then with water washed the Lord, telling Peter that he will understand later as he opposes (John 13.7 to 8)?
What needs to be said after this, except to refer to Psalm 58,10: ...
Explore this: In Aramaic language (the Baptist`s; JOHN 1,29 and 36) is the same word for servant and lamb. Because of punctuation (inserting vowels in Hebrew language - see OXFORD DICTIONARY) we have {two} significance, perhaps the comparison (Isaiah 53,7 ... like a lamb, 1 Peter 1:19 ... like a lamb without blemish and harmless), or any other meaningful context ( 1 Corinthians 5.7 ... Because even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us.) but never descend our Lord Savior on the level of any animals, birds, beasts ... (Romans 1:23), as in the Revelation 4.7; 5; 6.1 to 7; 15.7 ....
He were my Lord AS a lamb in front of his executioners, but to call Him an animal - lamb, which is like the dead [Rev. 5,6], can only heathens who worship gloat, ie. identify themselves with His murderers. Or you may re-crucifying Him, the wicked? You do not know that there is no more sacrifice for sins, but waiting the Last Judgment and the fire that will devour you? All Saints have always had a context of AS (comparison) or Pasha, to translate us to the NT, but to IDENTIFY OUR/MY LORD with animals for slaughter [Rev. 5,9 and 12], and in doing so there is nowhere RECALLING THE CROSS OR the Last Supper (ITS Sacred Communion,  bread of life, not lamb), and putting it all in the context FUTURE PROPHECY, THE END, THAT IS FINAL godlessness and mocking TO Christ Himself and all Christians!
The wicked JOHN THE REVELATOR so cunningly fabricated fairy tale stating that animals equate to the Holies and blasphemed the Holy Angels; also, the man generally equated with invented mark of the beast 666. Could Number of man and the number of the beast be the same? To recognize the man beast recognizing GENERAL - HUMAN - a human being at all? [Rev.13,18] In mathematics-number, ie. with math to judge, and indeed the Word of the Lord from the Gospel which seeks to carry out the will of God the Father pointing to the arm and 666 to overlook ???

...believer in resurrection, not death...

1 Corinthians 15.51 to 52 Behold, I shew you a mystery: We shall not all die, but we shall all be changed, and suddenly, in the blink of an eye, at the last trumpet, for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible. and we shall be changed.

1 Thessalonians 4.14 to 18 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose, so also God those asleep through Jesus bring with him. For you this is the Word of the Lord tells me that we live on the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who are asleep. For the Lord Himself with the commandment, voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, come down from heaven, and first the dead in Christ shall rise, then we who remain alive, we will be caught up together with them in the clouds to coming in to the Lord in the air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord. So confide one another with these words.
Much has been said in these two epistles, which does not require from us ANY alternative but to believe, because even Paul was not this published for himself or me or any other individual who is or will walk on this earth, but because of the CHURCH BODY, in which fellowship by FAITH approach. There's no faith with death, never in true Christians, it never existed, even if some of brothers tasted DEATH, have fallen asleep. 
There is no here The 1 st, or the 2 nd resurrection, nor anything that offended believers, nor this consolation anyone can "fit" into any of the false 2 resurrection, because if the first is not in a false revelation of communion with those who remained alive, and if the second, then Paul is not in the first, and they can not be called 3 rd; or, as it says in a false revelation, the dead revive themselves. Or maybe some fool really thinks he's smarter than all the apostles, and not to believe in the 2nd arrival, but even more in the 3rd? Or, rather, by the false revelation first resurrection will be in heaven, not on earth, to the second coming coincided with the second resurrection, which will already report some of the earth spirits, witness prophet example. REV.14,6? 
There's no any doubt: If Orthodox (and I am an Orthodox Christian) thought that WE ARE the only right, WE must declare, but may not be more restrained, even forbidding the reading of false revelation of the HOLY service WHICH IS HOLY LITURGY. If there is a dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church, in the world of communication and globalization, are responsible to arguments and promptly seize the flock out of hand pseudoCHRISTIAN sects, as the host of a man to ask. We Do not carry all the same responsibilities, but will be asked individually as much as he was given, or indeed some will not even be that would be required of them. As much as he was given in the broadest context.